I just went to the iTunes App Store, and in one impulsive click, downloaded Al Gore's companion app to his book "Our Choice: A Plan to Solve the Climate Crisis."
It's an immersive learning environment that begs the question - $4.99 iPad app or $49 textbook?
Watch this promo video and you decide if the eBook has made the traditional textbook a relic. If you need some more numbers to help you make the decision -a quick search on textbook costs turned up this data from a 2005 report by the U.S. Government Accountability Office. "The average estimated cost of books and supplies for a first-time, full-time student at a four-year public institution was $898, or 26 percent of the cost of tuition and fees. At community colleges, the estimated cost of books and supplies was a whopping 72 percent of the cost of tuition and fees."
EBook or textbook - still trying to decide? Don't forget that future updates of the app could add more content or features - how about social networking?
Update: A hat tip to my friend Martin Edic at 24PageBooks who pointed out that Push Top Press (the folks who did the Gore's book) plan to release a publishing platform for authors, publishers and artists to turn their books into interactive iPad or iPhone apps — no programming skills required. Imagine when students can make their own!
As you watch this video, think about what could happen in schools if adults got out of the way.
You'll hear students say things like, "A subject comes up that I don't know about, and instead of glossing over it, I truly find myself thinking was is that about? I could learn about it! I'm finding questions in everything." And "We learned how to learn, we learned how to teach, we learned how to work."
Of course, it's easy to discount these kids as atypical. Marginalizing them is far easier than wondering why other high school students are stuck doing worksheets.
For more information on the project and associated lesson plans for students see: "Independence Day: Developing Self-Directed Learning Projects"
Intel is hosting an education digital town hall at the Newseum that will explore new ways to "cultivate tomorrow's thinkers and entrepreneurs to sustain economic and educational success." (December 7 at 8:45 a.m. - 11:45 EST) Participants include Education Secretary Arne Duncan; Angel Gurria, the Secretary General of the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development; Rob Atkinson with ITIF; and Tom Friedman of the New York Times.
Let's see how the Duncan sidesteps the issue of testing and innovation - while US students spend endless hours honing their test taking skills, the demand for routine skills has disappeared from the workplace. Anyone know of a meaningful and rewarding career that looks like filling out a worksheet? Maybe Friedman will be willing to tackle the stifling impact of testing on creativity thinking among our students. For my thoughts on the subject, see my post "As NCLB Narrows the Curriculum, Creativity Declines"
"Education for Innovation" a live digital town hall
Watch the video here.
You can submit questions you would like the moderators, PBS NewsHour’s Gwen Ifill and Hari Sreenivasan, to discuss with the speakers. Then, vote the questions you like best to the top. Click here
You can join the for the live, interactive webcast on Tuesday, December 7 at 8:45 a.m. - 11:45 EST or join the conversation at Twitter/InnovationEcon use the hashtag #Ed4Innovation
More on the Program for International Student Assessment (PISA)
PISA is an assessment (begun in 2000) that focuses on 15-year-olds' capabilities in reading literacy, mathematics literacy, and science literacy. PISA studied students in 41 countries and assessed how well prepared students are for life beyond the classroom by focusing on the application of knowledge and skills to problems with a real-life context. For a detailed example of how PISA assesses sequencing skills see my post "Why Don't We Teach Sequencing Skills?"
For more PISA questions in reading, math and science see my blog post "Are Students Well Prepared to Meet the Challenges of the Future?" You can find some great critical thinking questions to use with your students
Response to sample question
This short response question is situated in a daily life context. The student has to interpret and solve the problem which uses two different representation modes: language, including numbers, and graphical. This question also has redundant information (i.e., the depth is 400 cm) which can be confusing for students, but this is not unusual in real-world problem solving. The actual procedure needed is a simple division. As this is a basic operation with numbers (252 divided by 14) the question belongs to the reproduction competency cluster. All the required information is presented in a recognizable situation and the students can extract the relevant information from this. The question has a difficulty of 421 score points (Level 2 out of 6).
One of the best aspects of my work is that I get to meet many talented educators. I'm on the road this week, and I invited two of them to do guest posts. This second post is by James Steckart, Director of Northwest Passage High School. I met Jamie this past summer at the Project Foundry unConference.
~~~~~~
"Hope... which whispered from Pandora's box after all the other plagues and sorrows had escaped, is the best and last of all things.”
~ Ian Cadwell (The Rule of Four)
We can disagree whether hope is the best of all things, but let us suppose for a moment that Cadwell speaks the truth. What does hope give the student, the teacher, the parent, the community? Most parents wake up and hope that the lives of their children are better than theirs, whether they live in poverty or in opulence. The community hopes that its members contribute in some positive way to the better of the whole. Most children when they grow have real meaningful dreams of hope. Finally, most teachers hope that their work contributes to the healthy development of the students in their charge.
This concept of hope is common sense, yet most schools do not understand how they can produce hopeful students. In fact for a majority of students working their way through the a conventional school system, I would argue and data we have would suggest that their overall hope disposition decreases with the more time spent in school. Why would anyone stay in a place where their dreams, questions, and hope are called into question and disparaged?
Let’s look at a school where the concept of hope is front and center. At Northwest Passage High School (NWPHS) the mission of the school is simple: Rekindling our hope, exploring our world, seeking our path, while building our community. Embedding hope into our mission statement, we sought a way to measure this concept to see if we were fulfilling our mission.
NWPHS is a small progressive charter school where half of the day students work with their advisor designing projects that meet state standards, and the other half of the day they are in small seminar classes focused on an interdisciplinary topic involving field research and working with community experts. In addition, the school schedules between 30-45 extended field expeditions to further enhance learning. In a typical year the students travel and conduct research in a variety of urban and wilderness areas throughout the United States and 2-3 select international sites.
Each fall new students to our school complete the Hope Survey for new students, and each spring every student completes the ongoing Hope Survey. The survey measures student engagement, academic press, goal orientation, belongingness, and autonomy and is administered through an internet browser.
This allows us to get a sense of how much and whether hope is being grown. For us the longitudinal data confirmed what we knew in our hearts about our philosophy and methodology of working with high school students. Our ongoing students last year had a high hope score of 50.74 out of 64 possible. What lessons has this given us to share with others?
Image: James Steckart
American education has been hijacked by policy makers who don't trust teachers, unions that are over-protective of job security, a private sector eager to privatize, and a standardized testing regime that rewards test prep over genuine learning. In the middle of it all, bored students disconnect from school as they realize that their main function is to be trivialized into a source of data for adults looking for someone to blame.
While America educational leadership offers hollow sound bites about life-long learning, Scotland's Curriculum for Excellence offers us insight into what American kids are missing. This video produced by the Scottish program offer a quick introduction to three project-based approaches. Here's two quotes from the video that say it all:
~ A student, "When you're just copying a text book ... you're looking at results which people have already achieved and proved their work... but when you doing it yourself you get an idea of how things work ... and what you actually need to make things successful."
~ A teacher, "In this approach ... your not teaching the subject in isolation - your teaching in a much more natural way ... with greater depth and more enrichment... there's an accessible point for every child in the class and they can build on that and take it in directions of their own personal interests."
In the coming weeks, schools across the country will reopen. I feel badly for the many teachers and students who will return to the grueling routine of test-prep. Perhaps they have convinced themselves that the foundation of teaching is to tell students something they did not previously know. As Donald Finkel has described it - teaching as telling. Do they see students as computers waiting for instructions? Teachers of high performing students forced to "install" the SAT / AP files while teachers of low performing students "upload" minimum competency on state exams. Different students and goals, but equal in the outcome that nobody will be having much fun.
Last week I attended Project Foundry's "2nd Annual unConference" in Milwaukee and was reminded that there is a growing core of schools and teachers who have rejected the mind-numbing routine of test-prep. I was uplifted knowing that these teachers and their students were getting ready for the rewards of a school year of project-based learning.
Project Foundry is a leading provider of online learning management systems with a focus on the needs of PBL classroom. Their conference assembled 60+ educators from across the country. These PBL teachers share a belief that students can't be programmed for the tests. Instead, they strive to provide a supportive learning environment that will foster the skills, motivation and responsibility for the students to become genuine life-long learners. (Not just the empty promise of typical district mission statement.)
The PBL teachers came from a wide variety of schools (urban / rural, experiential / career, charter / public school, high / low-needs students). They embodied many approaches, but they all shared the goal of helping students take increasing responsibility for their learning. It was no surprise that my keynote talk - "Supporting Reflective Learners" was warmly received by the attendees. See my post for more on my Taxonomy of Reflection.
As I walked into the unConference's host school - the Milwaukee's Professional Leadership Institute, I couldn't help but notice the powerful display of student work on the wall. (At left). It embodied a reflective, project-based approach in action and reminded me that across the country a small, but increasing number of students would embrace a new school year laced with the promise of self-discovery and personal growth.
Note: "In My Shoes", was a school studio project in the arts enrichment program offered by Artists Working in Education (AWE) and proposed and hosted by Milwaukee's Professional Leadership Institute. For a full description of the project see the excellent blog post by unConference attendee, Angie Tenebrini.
Newsweek Magazine recently discovered "The Creativity Crisis."
"... Since 1990, creativity scores have consistently inched downward."
Creativity is on the decline among our children. Walk into many classrooms and you'll see why. Our kids are too busy being force-fed a diet of "test-prep" to have any time to explore their learning in deeper, more open-ended approaches. NCLB marches on - narrowing the curriculum to the point that many elementary school no longer have time to devote to non-tested subjects. As if being a struggling learner is not punishment enough, students are pulled out of art and music - classes that offer hands-on learning and outlets for their creativity. What awaits them is likely “drill and kill’ that doesn’t sound like much fun for students or their teachers. (Of course, daily reading, writing and application of math should be common to every class. Let music students explore the mathematical elements of rhythm and then journal what they had learned. But that's another post!)
While NCLB began with the admirable goal of narrowing demographic performance gaps and putting an end to sorting kids on the “bell curve,” because of its myopic reliance on standardized (we don't trust teachers) testing - it has failed. And the great irony is that while our students spend endless hours honing their test taking skills, the demand for routine skills has disappeared from the workplace. Anyone know of a meaningful and rewarding career that looks like filling out a worksheet?
What's needed to restore creativity as the centerpiece of schools?
Creating requires both a strong foundation in content knowledge and the ability to apply that knowledge in new ways - usually across a variety of disciplines. It begins with a firm grasp of the basics and includes analyzing patterns and needs, evaluating alternatives and finally creating something new. When seen as as "a new combination of old elements," creating is not limited to the "creative." It's something that all students can do.
Learning must engage student in rigorous thinking at higher levels of thinking - analyzing, evaluating and creating. Are students expected to just consume information, or are they asked to create something original that demonstrates their learning? Student must have an opportunity to figure out their own process rather than just learn “the facts," and be given opportunities to reflect on their work and their progress as learners. For more on reflective thinking see my post: "The Reflective Student." Readers might also enjoy my post: "9 Questions for Reflective School Reform Leaders."
In education we have a history of "over-steering." Let's hope that that NCLB is declared DOA and that we rediscover a curriculum that sets our students and teachers free to explore a more engaging project-based approach. Our kids are inheriting a world with a host of problems that will require some out-of-the-box thinking and solutions.
I should note that later this week I will be keynoting at a the Project Foundry® Un-Conference - a gathering of 50 project-based-learning educators from across the country.
Image credit: Flickr / ePi.Longo
A colleague and creative friend, Brian C Smith is currently in the running for an H P EdTech Innovators Award with an innovative proposal for "The I.D.E.A Room." His project is based on his 4th-grade "Playful Inventors" workshop that Brian and his wife Wendy, (a STEM coach) piloted in 2009. The project had great success integrating the arts, science, engineering, and technology in creative problem solving environment
Please take a moment to read their proposal
and cast your vote here.
More on the project from Brian ...
Our faculty explored inquiry-based models of instruction and wanted to experiment with implementing a fully student-centered learning experience. After analyzing data from NYS 4th grade test scores, problems under the physical science realm were identified as most troublesome. Given their action research idea and the identified areas of weakness in science, a team of teachers designed the I.D.E.A Room program to provide students with opportunities to explore physical science concepts through the engineering design process while using technology as an integral component of their work. The Playful Inventors workshop, an after-school program implemented in the fall of 2009, allowed students freedom of time to play, explore, design, test, and problem-solve. Highlights of the success of the program include:
• Increased problem-solving strategies
• Reliance on cooperative learning
• Integration of the arts, science, engineering, and technology
• Creative uses of materials
• Increased proficiency with technology, including computer programming
• Deeper understanding of key concepts of force and motion
Our most important initiative is to continually shift instructional practices to become constructivist in nature using inquiry-based methods. We have discovered that in the classrooms where this is the norm, students are more self-directed in their learning, willing to take risks, creative in their approaches to problem solving, and demonstrate stronger team approaches to learning. In the I.D.E.A Room, projects are personal, yet learning is both iterative and social. The work by the teachers on the I.D.E.A. Room project has built the foundation for this instructional shift.
Our second initiative is to increase the use of technology to facilitate learning for both students and teachers. Students participating in the pilot program were able to use a wide variety of technology tools for learning, collaboration, and creation of content. Both the teachers and students in this group will be instrumental in assisting others to learn how technology can be transformative.
At the end-of-the-year I.D.E.A. Room Community Workshop, students will collaborate to create their multi-media presentation and practice their presentation skills. The Jr. Engineers will facilitate the hands-on stations as community members, including invited engineers from local industry experts, business owners, parents, and others try their hand at creating, designing and programming using the I.D.E.A. Room materials.
I've been asked to return as the keynote speaker at the Project Foundry® Un-Conference - a gathering of 75 PBL educators from California to New Jersey. This year it will be held July 29th - Friday July 30th 2010 in Milwaukee, WI. If you're looking to network with innovative educators who are committed to project-based learning, I urge you check this conference out. Plus they are one fun group!
Last year I keynoted at Project Foundry's first conference. The experience inspired the blog post (August 4, 2009) that I am reposting below:
Innovative Teaching is to Sustainable Farming as Test Prep is to _____?
Recently I spoke at a project-based learning conference in Wisconsin. I had been reading Michael Pollan's "The Omnivore's Dilemma,” so I had farming on my mind as I drove from the Milwaukee airport to Janesville WI past vast cornfields punctuated by enormous grain silos.
Pollan observes that high-yield corn is a product of genetically identical plants that can be densely planted without fear of any stalks monopolizing resources. As corn dominated the midwestern landscape, the region became an agricultural monoculture of expansive corporate cornfields – pushing out other crops and more diverse family farms. Cheap corn created the "Concentrated Animal Feeding Operation," where never-ending truckloads of feed are used to fatten cattle in the least time possible. "Big" corn and cattle production are artificially supported by vast, but unsustainable, industrial inputs of fossil fuels, petro-chemicals, and an elaborate transportation system.
And somewhere on the drive to Janesville, I got thinking that Pollan's indictment of corporate agriculture might be extended to some aspects of education. The testing regime is turning our kids into a high-yield, uniform commodity. Rows and rows of competent, standardized students, that can be delivered according to employers' specifications for a "skilled workforce.” Children “force fed” in test prep programs in efforts to quickly “fatten” the scores to meet AYP. Like the cornfields and feedlots that are disconnected from local ecosystems, the movement toward national educational standards erodes at local control and innovation.
Fortunately when I got to the conference I saw another side of contemporary education - innovative teachers. It was like walking into a sustainable farmers' market.
The conference was held at the TAGOS Leadership Academy and hosted by Project-Based Learning Systems, the developer of Project Foundry, a web-based management tool for innovative learning environments. Teachers had come from across the country - Chula Vista CA to Waterville ME. Like sustainable farms, their schools were deeply rooted in their communities, each closely tied to its unique local social ecology. Their programs fostered interdisciplinary learning, like the symbiotic polyculture of a farm based on a rotational interplay of crops and animals.
The PBL approach is based on the notion that rather than simply apply bodies of knowledge to problems, the exploration of problems can generate new bodies of knowledge. Teachers didn't attend the conference to simply “sit and get,” they were there to share. After my introductory talk and a planning session using my audience response system, the teachers self-organized into a series of peer-teaching sessions that took them through most the rest of the conference.
The next day I headed home feeling upbeat. I had met many fine teachers and instructional leaders who reminded me of why I went into education. Most of all, I thought about the scores of teachers across the country, working in innovative schools (or perhaps subversively innovating in traditional schools), committed to raising a “crop” that can sustain itself through a life time of learning.
Most school mission statements include a reference to "fostering life-long learners." Nonetheless if you walk through most schools you'll find an information landscape that seems designed to suppress that goal. Far too many adults telling students what to know - as if that will inspire them to take responsibility for their learning.
To explore the meaning of life-long learning at your school, I suggest you show this video (and a few of the comments it received) at your next faculty meeting. I've included a few questions for your follow-up discussion.
Background: "help with a bowdrill set" is a YouTube video posted by a young man looking for help in using his bowdrill to start a fire. After detailing his materials and techniques, he states "I know I'm doing it wrong. Please comment down below so you can teach me how to do it." If you view his YouTube post you'll see that his video has over 8500 views and fifty people took the time to offer concrete advice. I trust he's now successfully starting fires.
Guided questions:
1. How would you define teacher and student in this video? What roles / responsibilities do they have?
2. What information / skills / strategies did the young man lack? What did he have?
3. In what ways is the teaching / learning environment of this video similar to / different from your classroom?
4. What does all this suggest about the paths to life-long learning?
Tip of the hat to Angela Maiers and Ben Grey. I first saw this video at their 2010 ASCD conference workshop Link to my Prezi coverage of the conference
This Friday, my friends over at TurningTechnologies are sponsoring a free one-hour webinar entitled Impact Every Student: Simple Strategies That Provide Big Improvement (April 30, 2010 | 2:00 pm Eastern)
I was impressed with the frankness of their description "With all the options available to promote school improvement, where should we begin? If we're smart, we'll start by being honest." I'm all for honesty - you can only truly start from where you are.
The webinar promises to focus on how to engage teacher teams in effective assessment, planning and action. It features Mike Schmoker (author and consultant) , Tina Rooks, (K-12 Ed Consultant at Turning Technologies) and from the field - Sharyn C. Gabriel (principal) and Janet Bergh (reading coach) from Ocoee Middle School. Ocoee, FL
It should be valuable for teachers, leaders and all those dedicated to school improvement! Here's the link to the webinar.
Educators who are already using Twitter (and other social media) know the power of interaction with your own personal learning network. It's like a never ending seminar that you can freely visit to learn, share, and reflect. By far, the best professional development going! Likewise, more of our students are using social media to learn and to share their thinking / creativity with an authentic audience of peers.
While many teachers and students have embraced social media, most schools still lag behind, struggling with the question of whether they should formalize social media networks for their students, teachers, and community.
First step - help school leadership better understand what social media is and how it can be effectively utilized. (Hint: it's more than Twittering about what you had for lunch.)
My hats off to Hans Mundahl, Director of Experiental Learning and Technology Coordinator at the New Hampton School, who has provided a great video that introduces the potential for social media engagement for schools. He even simplifies it to this tidy equation ...
(Engagement + trust) x targeted audience = impact
Which translates into...
(social media + shared authentic conversation) x personal learning network = quick useful resource
When your done with the video be sure to take a look at the great wiki page resource that his PLN created.